The
increased poaching in the last three years and the rise of terror activities in
the country that crowned by the deadly Westgate Mall attack have led experts in
concluding that there is a link between illegal ivory and terrorism.
Spearheaded
by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) several organizations,
both local and international, have raised the red flag on the possibility that
al-Shabaab might be getting some of its money from illicit ivory trade.
“Shabaab’s
role is not limited to poaching and brokerage, but is a major link in the
chain, enabling them to reap huge profits from the mark-up in the trade,” said
an 18-month-long investigative report by The Elephant Action League that also claims
that up to 40 percent of the terror group’s activities could be funded through
poaching. “The harsh environment in which they operate, deprived of natural
resources or infrastructure to raid, makes ivory and rhino horn trade that much
more important”.
This
coincided with an article in Los Angeles
Times, by Laurel Neme, author of Animal Investigators: How the World’s
First Wildlife Forensics Lab Is Solving Crimes and Saving Endangered Species
that drew the same parallels.
“Our
investigation detailed how the Shabaab acts as a middleman, taking orders from
agents in Asia or Persian Gulf states and purchasing ivory from small-time
brokers to fill those orders,” Neme claims. “The terrorist group, we found,
pays better than many middlemen (about $90 a pound in 2012), making it an
attractive buyer. The brokers who engage the poachers, pay about $23 per pound,
which means they make hefty return in their dealings with Shabaab”.
This,
she says, is made worse by the fact that unlike small time poachers,
al-Shabaab-backed ivory hunters are more daring and use sophisticated and
hi-tech methods that are harder to fight.
In
her detailed explanation, Neme traces the bloody path that a piece of ivory
follows from the time jumbo is felled, the number of rangers and other
personnel that might get killed to the point where the finely polished ivory
trinket lands in a collectors trophy board somewhere in an effluent suburb in
Beijing.
“What
we know is that there are some powerful forces behind the current trade in
ivory but whether they are terrorists or not that we are not sure, so we can’t
mention names,” Paul Mbugua, Assistant Director and Spokesman for Kenya
Wildlife Service (KWS), told Extra.
“Judging by the huge size of the consignments that have been nabbed in the
recent past and the fact that nobody claims them point to somebody somewhere
with huge amounts of resources”.
Mbugua
says KWS have captured more than 13.5 tonnes of ivory in 2013 whose destination
was somewhere in Asia.
The most prominent of these consignments is the 3.8
tonnes that were intercepted at the Mombasa Port in July this year.
“Who
is the person with such a huge amount of money that he can risk buying tons of
ivory and believe they can compromise our systems to get it through,” Mr.
Mbugua poses. “It must be somebody with huge amounts of resources and a maze of
international connections”.
By
the time we were going to press Kenya had lost 267 elephants in 2013. At this
rate, some conservationists claims, the pachyderms might be extinct in the next
12 years.
The
statistics worryingly resemble the seventies and eighties where the elephant
population in Kenyan was depleted from 160,000 to a paltry 16,000 through a
vicious poaching.
Rhinos
are not doing any better with 24 of them having been felled by poachers so far
this year. Of these killings one of the most prominent was the murder of a
white rhino at the Nairobi National Park in August. Besides doubling as KWS
headquarters the park, the only one in the world next to a capital city, is the
most guarded in Kenya.
The
companies under whose names the illegal ivory is transported are usually
non-existent at the registrar of companies, making it impossible to their
owners.
“For
the last one year KWS, Kenya Police and Kenya Ports Authority (KPA) have been
working hand in hand to ensure no contraband trophies passes through Kenya,”
the KWS official says. “This has drastically discouraged potential smugglers
because of fear of losing their loot”.
After
the ivory is seized it is usually kept under the custody of Kenya Police until
the investigations are done, after which KWS assumes custody. After DNA
testing, the ivory is classified into that from within and without Kenya.
Since
former President Moi burned 12 million tons of ivory in 1988, the seized ivory
stockpile have accumulated to around 80 tons to date according KWS. The cache
is stored somewhere the organization is not will to reveal for security
reasons.
“According
to the law all the wildlife belongs to the government so KWS keeps the ivory
for the people of Kenya until such a time that a decision will be reached on
what to do with it,” Mbugua says. “We don’t reveal the location to anybody
including journalists due to the high value of cargo. It’s like telling Central
Bank of Kenya to reveal their currency vaults”.
He
cites an example of Zambia where the national ivory bank was raided and several
tons lost to unknown individuals.
But
why the escalation of poaching especially in the last few years given the huge
number of non-governmental organizations and millions of foreign dollars pumped
in the country to push the conservation agenda?
“Poaching
is like the drug world since there are far too many powerful individuals
involved,” laments a local conservationists and wildlife enthusiast who
preferred to remain anonymous for fear of her life. “We usually focus on the
middle men while the big guns that bankroll the operations remain untouchable.
We might shout from here to Moscow and employ everyone in GSU, have our rangers
killed left, right and center. But until and unless we address the people who
work with, and get paid by poaching big pins, it’s an endless cycle”.
She
claims that over the years senior people within KWS, NGOs and other
organizations with easy access to security details and information on game
reserves and parks are known to work with poachers.
“Best
wishes as you write, and please remember if your story is aimed at curbing
poaching in this country you have to do a jicho
pevu (a popular KTN investigative segment by Mohammed Ali) of sorts,” she
warned. “All these advocacy stunts are just to make money and close people’s
eyes from the real issue at hand. The real rot is deep within this intricate
system of vested interests”.
More
than 32 KWS personnel were interdicted early this year for allegedly
collaborating with poachers in killing animals in national reserves and game
parks.
Soila
Soiyale, a senior researcher at Amboseli Elephant Research Project (AERP) and
her son Robert Ntawasa were arrested at Emali town in May allegedly trying to
sell six pieces of ivory with a street value of Sh1.9 million.
She
denied the allegations and claimed that KWS officials implicated her by
planting the trophies in her car in a bid to deter her from exposing the
poaching syndicate inside Amboseli National Park.
The
fact that poaching could be funding activities that threaten national security
like the Westgate incidence have compelled foreign governments to increase
their efforts on the war against poaching.
In
July, the US President Barack Obama issued an executive order establishing the
cabinet-level Task Force on Wildlife Trafficking worth $10 million dollars,
with £3million earmarked for Kenya.
But
this is dwarfed by the annual returns from this dark trade estimated to be between
$7 to $10billion. The bloody enterprise is sustained by an unrelenting ivory
demands from Asia and Middle East where tusks and rhinoceros horns are used to
make decorative ornaments and traditional medicine.
“We
must address the perception that everyone is poaching and stop those people
from becoming engaged in poaching or ivory trafficking because everyone else is
doing this,” explained Dr. Paula Kahumba, a Kenyan conservationist and Executive
Director of WildlifeDirect, wrote in The
Guardian. “By applying behavioural lessons to the problem, we can recognize
and empower traditional African courts to honour African values, change
perceptions and grow a community that defends elephants despite economic
incentives”.
She
went on to cite the incidence where a rhino named Omni was killed in Ilingwesi
and the culprits caught using local elders networks.
Poaching
is not a problem affecting Kenya alone but the whole of the Great Lakes and
Southern Africa regions. In September, poachers in Zimbabwe killed more than 90
elephants by poisoning water holes and salt pans with cynide inside Hwange
Park.
More
than 11 million tons of ivory arrested in Kenya this year is from the
surrounding country, mostly Democratic Republic of Congo, Central Africa and
Cameroon.
KWS
in conjuction with several corporate entities launched a highly publicized
campaign dubbed Hands Off Our Elephants that was a trending topic a few months
ago.
KTN
anchors donned black armbands and did sections of prime time broadcasts from
Nairobi National Park to show their solidarity with the war against poaching.
But
experts and key players in the conservation sector says that this passionate
campaign will be of no good if key policy issues are not addressed locally and
abroad where rise in ivory demands have raised the stakes.
Harsher
penalties for culprits, tougher fight against corruption and persuading China,
Kenya’s newest economic partner with President Uhuru Kenyatta having received
Sh425 billion aid pledge during a recent visit, to ban poaching since it
provides the biggest single market in the world are some of the recommendations
by experts.
Many
experts agree that if contents of the Wildlife Conservation and Management 2013,
which was approved by the cabinet but is yet to be passed by parliament, are
enacted it could provide a huge deterrent to the current poaching tide.
Article
79 under offenses and penalties it states thus “Any person who commits an
offence in respect of an endangered or threatened species or in respect of any
trophy of that endangered or threatened species shall be liable upon conviction
to a fine of not less than ten million shillings or to imprisonment of not less
than fifteen years or to both such fine and imprisonment”.
Despite
ivory trade being banned globally by the Convention on International Trade in
endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITE) way back in 1989, in China
and Thailand the trade is still legal.
This
combined with the fact that ivory ornaments are status symbols in the now
economically endowed Asian giant explains the huge demand.
“The
demand for ivory has never been this high in the history of mankind,” Dr.
Kahumba told KTN during one of special coverage on the state of poaching. “The
first step will be to compel China, where trade in ivory is legal, to ban it
since illegal ivory is being imported in the country and then laundered”.
Even
with World Wild Fund ranking China as the biggest market in the world for
illegal ivory the country still denies that its unquenchable hunger for
elephant tusks is fuelling poaching in Africa.
Chinese
authorities claims that only 37 companies, whose annual ivory consumption
should not exceed 5,000 kilograms, are allowed to work with ivory and 145 to
sell the finished products.